Tuesday, 2 April 2013
On the one hand the advances whit the experiments making whit animals keep advances more quickly and best for the improvement of the humanity.
On the other hand people think that animals have feelings , and they have reason , the animals suffer like humans and it is very bad for the health of the animals.
In conclusion, the experiments whit animals are good for the advances in medicines, etc. but it is very bad for the animals and for her health, and it could be prohibited.
Monday, 1 April 2013
Animal testing could be considered cruel or which might be the discovery of things that could help people.
First would be nice if the animals don't suffer damage, or practices will cause problems in the lives of animals, altering their functions.
But on the other hand the use of animals, could help the human life, and this would be a good reason.
I think animal testing, would bring many good consequences, so it would be justified, animals help improve or save the lives of many people, Is a necessary cruelty.
one of the products that are tested on animals are lotions, it is necessary that all people who wants to use lotion, the people should be certain of its effectiveness.
These practices in animals, some shouldn't because they are selfish and the animals shouldn't be treated badly because they also feel and suffer, for example: the use of animals in military experiments, a dog locked in a room and poison him with gas, this is something cruel and inhuman.
In conclusion Animal testing is not bad at all, but I think you should just experiment with really useful things, not killing animals of violent ways.
There are different views on the use of animals in research. Some people think it is right and good but others are against using animals for research.
People who are against it is because they do not like to perform experiments on animals and believe that animals have the right to live freely, and not be used as if nothing will happen.
People who think it is right, say it is good because it shows that we are created drugs that cure, and not make us sick, which means that saves us all, and frees us from dying.
In my opinion this good you perform these investigations because of them many people have been saved and free us from many diseases and complications in our body.
On the one hand, a lot of people think that prove medicaments or chemical substances in animals is bad but... i think, in persons? On people is not bad? oh my god !
Testing in animals can be very beneficial for the future of animals and tests
In my opinion if we want animals healthier and stronger in the future, help to discover new drugs, vaccine... if we not investigated we can not discover new cures for diseases. We must investigate now them, otherwise, nothing will.
On the one hand, there are people who thinks that we should or we have to protect the animals because there are a part of our world and if we don´t take care of them we will destroy them and the nature.
On the other hand, there are people who thinks that scientific testing on animals are necessary because the scientific experiment on humans are prohibit. This tipe of people thinks that the scientific experiment are indispensable for the world and if we can test with people we are doing this think and the reason why we are testing with animals is because we can´t test with people.
In conclusión, for me and for a lot of people testing with animals is a cruel thing andif it is neccesary for the world the scientifics should test only with small animals
Animal testingThe experimentation on animals increased, especially the practice of vivisection, so did criticism and controversy. In 1655, the advocate of Galenic physiology Edmund o'Meara said that "the miserable torture of vivisection places the body in an unnatural state." Others argued that animal physiology could be affected by pain during vivisection, rendering results unreliable. There were also objections on an ethical basis, contending that the benefit to humans did not justify the harm to animals.Many people believed that animals were inferior to humans and so different that results from animals could not be applied to humans.
On the other side of the debate, those in favor of animal testing held that experiments on animals were necessary to advance medical and biological knowledge.
Animals are also used foreducation and training; are bred for use in laboratories; and are used by the military to develop weapons, vaccines, battlefield surgical techniques, and defensive clothing.For example, in 2008 the United States used live pigs to study the effects of improsive explosive devices explosions on internal organs, especially the brain.
In the US military,goats are commonly used to train combact medics (Goats have become the main animal species used for this purpose after the Pentagon phased out using dogs for medical training in the 1980s.) While modern mannequins used in medical training are quite efficient in simulating the behavior of a human body, trainees feel that "the goat exercise provides a sense of urgency that only real life trauma can provide".
I´m agree with the idea that to use animals in laboratorus for to do experiments with them for help to the sick people.
Because the people that are sick need new medicines for the recovery and if this medicine funtions with the animals, the medicines will function with the ills too.
But on the hand, to use animals for experiment is a little cruel because they also are living beings and they don´t deserve are treat so badly.
I think that the scientists ougth to look into methods for the animals don´t suffer so much.
I think animal testing is not altogether bad because if they would human many people will die while the animals die but I think human being we prefer to think that animals die before people.
I believe that laboratories should use animals only in tests of to treat diseases and in this way they'll prevent unnecessary suffering of many animals.
In conclusion, I believe proper the use of animals in science, whenever it is done in moderation and absolutely necessary.
The good part are that we can create new animals or change is structure eg. But like everything there is also a bad part is that the animals could be die or whatever else.
Now, the good things about scientific testing on animals is that we know all the features of the animal (hormones, enzymes ...) and we can also create a new animal or gene. Also if the animal has any disease we can experiment with the animal to find a vaccine or whatever else to save the animals who have the same disease.
On the other hand there are bad things like the animal could be die or be more aggressive eg. More scientifics said that the testing are safe but you didnt know this until you try, can go right or wrong if it goes wrong, the animal will suffer. The Animals also have feelings like humans so they also suffer pain.
In conclusion, my opinion are that we shouldn't experiment with animals because animals don't deserve to be made to suffer becasue well.. many tests nothing happens but others if happens.
The advantages and inconvenients are:
I start talking about their inconvenients against animal testing is that there are other acceptable alternatives. For example, scientists can test whether chemicals irritate the eyes using the membrane rich in blood vessels Those who are against animal testing proposed: replacement, alternative methods of testing, reducing animal testing using as little as refinement possible and ensuring that animal tests are done as humanely and painlessly as possible, however, alternatives to animal testing does not always work because the system of a living organism can be unpredictable, the rights of animals say the tests performed on them are cruel and unnecessary all living creatures should be respected and that cause suffering to animals for any reason is morally wrong.
Now show you the advantages:
these tests say they have been many advances in science, increasing the quality of life for both humans and animals. Animal testing has helped develop vaccines, surgeries, cancer treatments and other life-saving medical advances.
my opinion is that these scientific tests on animals are necessary for the advancement of science because we could not live without vaccines, cancer treatments, etc. ..
but without having to carry the animals to extreme cases.
Many people think that animal experiments only a waste of time and money, but my opinion is the opposite. There are certainly people who are for and against, on the one hand we find those who say that using animals can go a long way in various fields of medicine, for example, rats, animals that are more common cancer-related activities, but on the other hand we find animal advocates who say such actions go against the rights of the same animals.
My opinion is common, I agree with which animals, but whenever a purpose beneficial to society.
Hi, now I'm going to talk about the scientific evidence in animals and give arguments for and against this option.
Animal testing can be very beneficial for the future of animals and nature, there are many interesting tests but one that is the most beneficial of transgenic animals, injected a virus into the gene to be incorporated into animal and an animal creates bigger and healthier.
Others say that these tests can be very good but they are very harmful to the animals exposed to the test. They say they can be beneficial but reaffirms that can have side effects for animals.
In short, my opinion is that before any test, you should investigate if there is a negative effect, if all is well then you can do all beneficial to the animals tests.
Some people think that spend time and money investigating with animals could be a waste of time and money.
They argue that science should try to resolve other problems however I am completely agree with this research because I think it can help us to improve the health in our contry and to find new solutions in the field of medicine, what´s more there´re people who are against but then they don´t dare to buy anything that hasn´t been tested before.
On the one hand it´s certainly that if a scientist discover a product, the only way to konw if it´s health for us is tasted with animals before besides lots of laboratory animals have a goof life and the test aren´t so cruel for example there are test that only consist to know the average of their life.
On the other hand animals have emotions like humans do furthermore they feel pain, in addition to this normally some people think that some laboratory animals haven´t got the basic conditions to have a great life, they think that animals live in small spaces and they probably suffer stress.
In conclusion, I understand that they need to taste the product with animals who probably will have the same reaction than us, but I understand too that sometimes they don´t have good living conditions so it´s better if in the future they could taste the products in virtual humans and obtain the same results.